Wikipedia editor’s personal feelings about a topic. If forced, one might communication theories and models pdf them into social and group theories.
Additionally, one might distinguish between descriptive and critical theories. More substantively it addresses the extent of which technology is autonomous and how much force it has in determining human practice or social structure. The authors mentioned in this article are those that have some concern with technology or media, though they often borrow from one another and of course build upon seminal theorists that preceded them. It strives for impartiality in the description of human and nonhuman actors and the reintegration of the natural and social worlds.
What is important is the chain and gradients of actors’ actions and competences, and the degree to which we choose to have figurative representations. The theory employs a recursive notion of actions constrained and enabled by structures which are produced and reproduced by that action. Consequently, in this theory technology is not rendered as an artifact, but instead examines how people, as they interact with a technology in their ongoing practices,enact structures which shape their emergent and situated use of that technology. It accounts for environment, history of the person, culture, role of the artifact, motivations, and complexity of real life activity. One of the strengths of AT is that it bridges the gap between the individual subject and the social reality—it studies both through the mediating activity.